<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>10e20 - Latest Comments in Is Corporate Blogging Worth the Effort?</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/</link><description>Social Media Marketing Blog by 10e20</description><atom:link href="https://10e20.disqus.com/is_corporate_blogging_worth_the_effort/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:17:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Corporate Blogging Worth the Effort?</title><link>http://www.10e20.com/blog/2007/01/31/is-corporate-blogging-worth-the-effort/#comment-16679330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good post. My latest blog post and article also deals with the topic of whether companies should have a blog. If the mindset is right and the reasons are clear, I certainly agree that blogging is worth "effort".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gino</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:17:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Corporate Blogging Worth the Effort?</title><link>http://www.10e20.com/blog/2007/01/31/is-corporate-blogging-worth-the-effort/#comment-16679329</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tamar ... without a question it's worth it for most companies. It's a coincidence but I wrote about corporate blogging just yesterday ... or was it today? Anyway, here is the post about Bill Marriott doing "his thing" &lt;a href="http://www.bizmord.com/Blog/archives/232" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.bizmord.com/Blog/archives/232"&gt;http://www.bizmord.com/Blog...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Igor M. (BizMord Blog)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Corporate Blogging Worth the Effort?</title><link>http://www.10e20.com/blog/2007/01/31/is-corporate-blogging-worth-the-effort/#comment-16679328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Even people who use "blogs" don't know what it really is and this ends up confusing people because they use the term in different contexts.  FOX News in New York, for example, has a "blog." On &lt;a href="http://myfoxny.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="myfoxny.com"&gt;myfoxny.com&lt;/a&gt;, there's a simple question that you can answer in a popup window, and your "blog" may get featured on the nightly news.  That's not what we define as blogs.  If anything, that's a comment submitted through a website, but the news anchors make it sound hip and cool and it consequently involves community participation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only trouble with this is that people who watch the nightly news are never going to get the definition of "blog" correct because FOX News's definition is so ... different.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tamar Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:09:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Corporate Blogging Worth the Effort?</title><link>http://www.10e20.com/blog/2007/01/31/is-corporate-blogging-worth-the-effort/#comment-16679327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are 100% correct.  The problem I find is that many businesses outside the tech industry don't really understand blogs.  The more they learn, the more interested they are in launching one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brad shorr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:47:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>